May significantly change for Nadal IF he does get to 17 Slams?

I am talking about, many previously consider him as the next best player to ever grab a racket letting him easy passing past both Borg and Sampras even though he's yet to pass them statistically on the Slam pole. Besides, do not you look a lot more remarkable having a massively lopsided H2H against some one regarded as the best tennis player ever - WITHOUT matching his Slam whole? You OWN the top cat. By matching his Slam total do not you risk losing MAJOR glow from that feat? Because then you definitely are only his 'equivalent' - with an improved H2H report. The juice is limited by that from the energetic - notably. In addition, you can find just so MANY remarkable articles in the field that'll not have already been even grazed enroute No. 17 that the very best Nadal should expect to be is 1( t). He is able to NEVER be the undisputed GOAT. Passing 17, nevertheless, might provoke anything but that seems near-impossible today. You CANNOT be the undisputed GOAT as well as a 1( a) only predicated on your H2H from the undisputed 1( a). That's without even inserting the rest of the VITAL numbers like weeks @ No. 1 - total and sequential, year-end No. 1, WTF titles, four or even more titles @ other Slams, the arsenal of images etc. Just forget about trivial stuff like the Slam semifinal talent and others. Add that and you're a distant 1( t) at most useful - with corresponding Slam total. Therefore it is exactly about going from No. 2 to a distant 1( b) with a cost tag much too costly (and perhaps fatal) for that 'minor' change.